Like most reporting coming from modern journalism, everything is innuendo and insinuation, even from the
Washington Times. That being said it seems like there is some solid ground for thinking that James Comey wrote his exoneration of Hillary Clinton in the e-mail investigation before key witnesses had been interviewed. His mind was made up and he wanted it to be clear before he was confused by the facts. Two senators seem to be pursuing the issue and in a letter to FBI director said,
“‘Conclusion first, fact-gathering second — that’s no way to run an investigation,’ the senators wrote...’”
The problem is the government and the news media seem to work this way.
If the accusations are true then there should be arrests, indictments and trials. If it is all a smoke screen it seems that there is an awful lot of smoke for no fire.
homo unius libri
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcome. Feel free to agree or disagree but keep it clean, courteous and short. I heard some shorthand on a podcast: TLDR, Too long, didn't read.