An article in The Daily Signal looks at the potential for fraud by the counties that have more registered voters than they have people eligible to vote.
The logical concern is expressed this way:
“When dead people or those no longer living in a specific voting jurisdiction continue to be registered there, voter integrity advocates argue, the likelihood for voter fraud increases.”Again, that is something so clear it should require no brain to understand. What is there to disagree about?
The response goes like this,
‘In a statement published in several media outlets, however, Grimes spokesman Bradford Queen said the Judicial Watch lawsuit is “without merit” and is an attempt to “make it harder for people to vote.”’Taken at face value this is ridiculous. Dead people can’t vote so how can you make it harder? Non-citizens are not supposed to vote so why should you not make it harder?
At the current point it is mainly the Democrats that don’t want to clean up the roles and the Democrats that are in favor of corrupt elections. That may change in the future but that is the reality of now.
Give it a read. The only way you can be against cleaning up the voter roles is if you want to cheat and manipulate the elections. I think that if this were presented clearly and repeatedly it could be a winning platform issue in 2018 and 2020.
homo unius libri
There has been fraud on both sides in the past yet percentage-wise, from everything I've read, the fraud has always been overwhelmingly democrat. Sorta tell ya sumthin'!
ReplyDeleteDuring my awareness I would agree. Currently, no question.
DeleteGrace and peace
I wonder why Democrats never went after New Hampshire the same way they went after Wisconsin and Michigan...
ReplyDeleteI think NH is one of the states that has Constitutional Carry. You don't need any silly permits to pack heat. It discourages people from messing with them. Also, there are not as many delegates to worry about.
DeleteGrace and peace.