I was sitting in Sunday school, paying attention, listening, and with my mind turned on. The teacher was working through the verse below, and made a comment that the husband of Candace was one of the wise men at Jesus’ birth.
Acts 8:27 (KJV) And he arose and went: and, behold, a man of Ethiopia, an eunuch of great authority under Candace queen of the Ethiopians, who had the charge of all her treasure, and had come to Jerusalem for to worship,At that point, my bologny meter went off, and I almost stood up and said, “No”. We need to be aware that there is a difference between tradition and truth. It is possible that the church in Ethiopia had a tradition that the husband of Candace was one of the wise men. I would not quarrel that is their tradition. However, tradition is not always based in fact. A little thinking can go along way. I believe that the Gospel account says that the wise men came from the east. I don’t know if you are aware of any geography, but Ethiopia is to the south. Unless the husband of Candace was on an extended sabbatical, studying with the astronomers of the east, there is no way that he could’ve qualified to be one of the wise man at the birth of Jesus. We need to be aware that there is a difference. Tradition is sometimes based in fact, and almost believable. In fact, tradition might even be true, but not necessarily. If we want to be a person who has any clout in our world, you need to keep your mind turned on and acknowledge a difference between tradition and verifiable facts.
homo unius libri
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcome. Feel free to agree or disagree but keep it clean, courteous and short. I heard some shorthand on a podcast: TLDR, Too long, didn't read.